Hundreds of thousands of people flock each year to the Florida Keys for world-class fishing, diving, and the breathtaking scenery. The Keys stretch 110 miles from Key Largo to Key West and are home to about 80,000 people. Because residents desire homes adjacent to the water with dock space for boats, finger canals have become an essential characteristic of Keys life. Today there are 481 canals, totaling 111 miles, in Monroe County.

Monroe County officials are concerned about water quality degradation in the canals. According to George Garrett, director of the Monroe County Marine Resources Department, there are currently about two dozen county canals with no access to open water—they remain plugged due to changes in environmental regulations imposed in the 1970s. Residents have also long reported a problem with flotsam entering open canals with the accumulating seaweed decaying and fouling the waterway.

After the polygon layer representing the residential canals was created and verified, ArcView was used to populate the attribute table with physical characteristics that could potentially impact water quality in the canals. These attributes included canal area, width, length, number of mouths, degree of convolution, and latitude and longitude of the centroids of the canals. The number of convolutions was determined by measuring the number of 90-degree turns, or fractions of 90-degree turns, in the canal.

The existing data that had been gathered, inventoried, and evaluated during an extensive data compilation effort was processed and input to the project GIS and related to the residential canals. Information varied from topography and land use information to water quality data dating back 40 years. The water quality data was particularly challenging to incorporate, as historically it had been developed on a project by project basis that included only small sections of the Keys. Many of the source data sets lacked a complete metadata record of the methodologies and instrumentation used.

Although the historical water quality data was of value to see general trends in parameter variability, it was impossible to compare many data sets that were collected using different (or undocumented) methods. The data quality control review included a review of methodologies and documentation. Only data with comparable methods and documented protocols could be confidently compared between different monitoring stations over time. A separate GIS layer was provided as a point file of existing water quality monitoring station locations and linked to the sampling data.

MACTEC collected sufficient information, through GIS analysis of physical attributes, to evaluate potential impacts to water quality without the cost of a large-scale field sampling effort. For example, the number of convolutions and the length of a canal were used to estimate a canal's ease of circulation with adjacent nearshore waters. A classification model for the canals was created with canals queried and grouped by common physical characteristics. MACTEC developed a method to determine estimated water quality for each canal based on its classification, and the soundness of the developed methodology was verified by comparing the estimated water quality with the actual water quality where data was available. The values agreed, and water quality could then be estimated for all canal systems without a large-scale field effort.

GIS was also used to develop a strategy for selecting the canal specific treatment approaches and technologies that would improve water quality. ArcView was again used to query the physical attributes, which were the major factor in determining the most applicable and cost-effective options. The process also presented a methodology for prioritizing canals based on available funding or immediate interest of local residents to "do something" to improve canal water quality.

As a final step, ArcView was used to identify data gaps and recommend the type of canals Monroe County should sample if it decides to conduct a field sampling effort.

"This report will give us the necessary tools to fully understand the situation and come up with cost-effective solutions," Garrett says. "We anticipate implementing many of these technologies in the near future because different solutions will be required for different areas throughout the canal system. Now that we have a full understanding of the situation, we can also launch a public outreach program so canal residents can be educated."

ArcView has helped Monroe County establish a methodology for grouping canals by design features most likely to impact water quality, thus providing a method for assessment of treatment technologies for individual canal systems.

For more information, contact George Garrett, director of the Marine Resources Department, Monroe County (tel.: 305-289-2507, e-mail: garrett-george@monroecounty-fl.com); Wendy Leonard, project manager, MACTEC, Inc. (tel.: 305-826-5588, e-mail: wcleonard@MACTEC.com); or Karen Zahalka, GIS manager, MACTEC, Inc. (tel.: 770-421-3447, e-mail: kazahalka@MACTEC.com).